5 Comments
User's avatar
Colette Prefontaine's avatar

Interesting how the complaining starts when the attack dogs that were great tools when used on undesirable infrastructure and energy projects are now coming back to bite in the **** Are we beginning to sense a theme yet?

Expand full comment
Barry Butterfield's avatar

I made a similar complaint on Part 1 of this series. The concessions GIVEN to renwables are a travesty. Ms Chiappa and Mccarthy need to realize once and for all that green energy is far from being green.

Expand full comment
Allen Inks's avatar

Hmmmm... spurious lawsuits not based on good science to whose sole purpose delay, and drive up costs, making the projects uneconomic. Are you sure it's not a nuclear plant? Because that sure sounds familiar.

Expand full comment
Gavin's avatar

how about wind power is not dispatchable and therefore contributes nothing to decarbonization which is a pointless exercise as co2 is not a climate driver and should be about 900 ppm for a better planet.

Expand full comment
The Radical Individualist's avatar

Ah, yes. Lawyers at their best. The lawyers on both sides in a legal dispute make big bucks. And they keep making them for as long as the dispute wears on. So, where is the incentive to settle?

Expand full comment