Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Al White's avatar

What you have outlined without actually saying it, is that the “climate change“ that we have experienced in this current Modern Warm Period, has been greatly beneficial. If one studies climate history, though, this should come as no surprise. Every previous one, the Minoan, Roman and Medieval Warm Periods to name the last three, have produced the same result. During the Medieval Warm Period for example, agricultural production exploded, and population increased 500% in Europe. Unfortunately, every previous warm period has ended in a cold snap. The Medieval Warm Period ended in the Little Ice Age, the Roman Warm Period ended in the Dark Ages Cold Period and the Minoan Warm Period ended in a cold period that contributed to the late bronze age collapse. So the moral of this story is be careful what you wish for. Warmer equals wetter equals more prosperity. Colder equals crop failures, famine, war and chaos. Enjoy the warmth while we have it. It won’t last forever.

Expand full comment
Sharon F.'s avatar

I've got a different take on adaptation. For water resource folks, natural resource folks, farmers, and the allied academic disciplines.. climate is one of many things we are adapting to, and have been adapting to, as part of our normal way of doing our work. For example, droughts have always existed. We have ways of dealing with them. At what point does our work cross the line into being "climate" adaptation?

And in what sense is the anti-adaptation movement about keeping climate funding in certain disciplines' pockets (modelers, solar and wind) and out of ours (plant breeders, water resources and so on)?

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts